The Ukraine Crisis: A Case of Déjà Vu?

When the Russian government ordered troops to effectively occupy the Crimean region of Ukraine in response to the overthrow of the pro-Moscow government in Kiev, it was all too familiar to Daniel Fata ’94 (CLAS). Fata, now vice president at the Cohen Group, a Washington, D.C.-based global consulting firm, was the Pentagon official who coordinated the U.S. response to Russia’s 2008 invasion of neighboring Georgia. Fata, who served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for European and NATO policy from September 2005 to September 2008, says that earlier crisis can offer the West important lessons about how to respond now.

ukraineFata, who earned a bachelor’s degree in political science with honors, credits UConn – and, in particular, an Introduction to International Relations course taught by professor emeritus Fred Turner – with helping to set him on the course that brought him to a high-level public service career. During a recent visit to campus when he spoke to undergraduates and graduate students, Fata – proudly sporting a Husky necktie – had the chance to speak with UConn Today about the crisis in Ukraine.

The interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Q: Did the U.S. learn any lessons from Georgia that apply to the Ukraine situation?

There were a few things that we learned with Georgia that can help us understand how to navigate this current crisis. The first thing is not to believe what Moscow says. During the Georgia crisis, Moscow was saying their only intention was to protect Russian citizens and they didn’t have any intention to advance on the capital. And then when they did try to advance on Tbilisi, they said, we’re just protecting Russian citizens. What we didn’t understand was that their definition of “Russian citizens” is fairly elastic, and that their real goal was to unseat [Georgian President Mikheil] Saakashvili.

Q: What should be the goal of Western nations now that Russia has effectively taken Crimea under its umbrella?

The first goal should be to stop further Russian expansion into Ukraine or into other countries along its border. Second, we need to express solidarity with our allies in the region, which we didn’t do enough during the Georgia crisis. We need to do tangible, demonstrative things: more joint military exercises, for example. Our allies there are right at the spear’s point, and we need to do more than just talk about solidarity. Finally, we need to beware of a “Georgian back door”: while the world is focused on Ukraine, Russia could use this opportunity to finish the job in Georgia, or to expand into a different territory. Rolling back Russian gains in Ukraine should also be a goal, but that’s going to take a lot longer.

Q: There’s been a lot of speculation about the motivation of Russian President Vladimir Putin. What’s your sense of his goals?

Read the full story at UConn Today.


By: Tom Breen

More News Stories

Upcoming Events

  1. Oct 16 HACHA: Alternative Hour for a Hospitable Community of Border-Crossing Academics12:00pm
  2. Oct 16 PNB Seminar Series : Dr. Jeffrey R. Holt4:00pm
  3. Oct 16 Research Connections5:30pm
  4. Oct 17 SLRDG - Sarah Sparks9:30am
  5. Oct 17 Borders of Belonging: Struggle and Solidarity in Mixed-Status Immigrant Families9:30am